What is the role of reviews in promoting a tipster service?

What do you expect from an Italian Serie B Prediction Site? Your expectations would be high but the hope should be based on facts like tracking record of the tipster in providing real tips and public opinion in favor of the site.

Would you expect the site to figure in expert reviews as the most accurate soccer prediction site? What if the site doesn’t get a respectable place in reviews? Or it would be better to ask how reviews influence the reliability of tipsters. Expectations run high when a tipster site claims the top position but the expectations should be based on a firm ground.

·         When you see a tipster claiming to have the highest number of positive reviews, you find a base to rely on that tipper. You believe that the feedback would be from genuine clients.

·         In reviews, bettors share their experience and opinion about their tipsters. Reading reviews is a great way to make an opinion on a tipper. You learn from the experience of others.

·         Expert reviews are different from general opinion. An expert can give insight into a tipster site. He can tell what is good about that site and whether it is reliable.

·         A reliable tipster site should figure in expert reviews but it isn’t necessary for every website to get the attention of experts. There are many tipsters that are working well without any help from experts.

There is little doubt that user reviews and feed backs influence opinions but at the same time the feedback should be genuine. So, how would you determine the authenticity of a review?

·         The first thing you will note in a review is its length. A user-written review would be short and crisp. It is so because users don’t spend much time in writing reviews. Lengthy reviews are generally faked.

·         It is words that will hold your attention. But a user would use simple words like “exciting, amazing and wonderful”. Also, there would be no repetition of words.

·         A user-generated review would be very straightforward instead of specific. But an online marketer would write a comparative review to attract eyeballs.

·         You will love reading user-generated reviews but marketing reviews would be boring.

You need going through each review to make an opinion on tipsters. But just reading reviews won’t help if you don’t focus on the content.

·         Users would tell what they like most in specific tipster service but online marketers would elaborate on the service.

·         Users won’t encourage you to rely on a specific tipper but a marketer would try to convince you to buy tips from a tipster. Users are little interested in readers relying on their words.

·         Users won’t challenge you to verify their claims but marketers would claim to provide  sport verified prediction. Users write reviews only to thank tipsters but marketers write reviews for branding and promotion.

·         Users won’t mention the name of the most accurate soccer prediction site in their reviews but marketers would repeat the names again and again. Or they will use keywords to highlight the website name.